Unfortunately, workplace injuries occur in many different occupations, and from the employer’s perspective, understanding liability is important. Legally, employers are called upon to ensure work environments devoid of harm, although an accident might still happen. If those situations do occur, it would be so vital that identifying who must bear responsibility for any probable damage or compensation would be paramount. This article delves into employer liability in workplace injury cases with a view to ensuring that one clearly perceives the legal responsibilities.
Contents
Employer Liability in Workplace Injuries
The employer’s legal responsibility stemming from work-related accident in majority of the cases relates to the employer’s legal responsibilities towards an employee. It is the prerogative of the employer to ensure the safety of their work place and or its environment. This mean the employer has to exercise such degree of care that would prevent occurrences of accidents at the workplace, and to do this the employer has to adhere to the worth workplace safety standards and occupational health regulations. This duty of the care would also include the aforesaid duty to ensure that the equipment are well maintained, that the employees were well trained and that safety measure were properly followed.
When this responsibility is breached-isn’t fixing a known hazard or giving employees proper protective equipment or failing to properly train an employee, for example-and an injury ensues, the employer may be liable. A good example would be that working construction or manufacturing greatly increases one’s risk; thus, employers must go to even greater extents of precautions. Where an employee gets injured at work due to some faulty machinery that the employer knew was defective yet did nothing to fix, the legal consequences for the employer are quite dire. While employers in less hazardous industries – say, office workers – are still obligated to minimize risks such as slipping accidents or faulty wiring.
A landmark case that gives a good example of the principle of due care is Smith v. Charles Baker & Sons, where the court in this case decided that employers have the duty of care towards their employees not to expose them to known hazards. Though over one hundred years ago, the principle remains the same today: failure to provide a safe workplace may lead to employer liability.
Common Causes of Workplace Injuries
Occupational injuries are known to happen in every kind of job, but some jobs are more dangerous than others. Common causes of workplace injuries include:
- Slips, trips, and falls: They are some of the common occurrences at the workplace, and they occur in various prevalence.
- Equipment malfunctions: At places where various kinds of machinery are used, it becomes possible for people to get badly injured due to constriction of proper machinery.
- Overexertion: Mass demanding occupations are associated with injury from working hard or undergoing strenuous tasks most of the time.
- Exposure to harmful substances: Chemical manufacturing or construction industries for example, provide environments that include exposure to risky materials that can lead to sickness or accidents.
- Lack of proper training: One adverse effect of having a poor organizational training administration process is that the incidence of accidents tends to skyrocket as employees who have not been trained appropriately sue for their jobs.
Workers’ Compensation: The Default System
Most vocational injury cases are disposed through the workers’ compensation system, a no-fault insurance that pays benefits to injured employees regardless of fault. Workers’ compensation is customarily designed to guarantee immediate medical treatment and wage replacement for injured workers in exchange for immunity of the employer from costly litigation. However, not everything can be claimed under workers’ compensation, and injured employees, in certain cases, may resort to more litigious remedies.
Workers’ compensation generally covers medical expenses, some lost wages, and rehabilitation costs. This process protects an employee and an employer since an injured employee will get necessary help without proving anyone’s fault. Like any other insurance, workers’ compensation will not cover items such as pain and suffering or punitive damages. The worker can also seek redress outside worker compensation law if the employer was wantonly negligent or malicious.
For instance, for the states such as the Illinois that boasts of having some of the best workplace injury legislations, a right system can be followed right down to the claims relating to workers compensation. Complications also arise, however, in the latter-primarily, in establishing whether or not an injury occurred in the course of employment. As an example, an employee who gets an injury at the time of break or on their way to or from work will have a very difficult time proving that their injury occurred while working. This is where a Chicago personal injury attorney for example comes in handy as one struggles to dodge a tangle of workplace injury claims.
When are Employers Held Directly Liable?
Most workplace injuries are covered by workers Compensation. Sometimes, nevertheless, direct liability to the employer becomes appropriate. This is usually so when the accident happened because the employer was negligent or when the employer had engaged in an unlawful activity. Some instances where employer liability may come into effect include:
- Failure to Follow Safety Regulations: Employer negligence can arise either where an employer has not put in place legally mandated safeguards and an injury ensues from this or where an employer knows a condition or activity is risky and a worker is harmed by that risk.
- Intentional Injury: In addition, the workers compensation also has a civil remedy clause, which means that if the employer purposefully causes harm to a worker, the latter is allowed to sue the former in court independent of the workers compensation system.
- Gross Negligence: Employer can be deemed responsible for an injury sustained by an employee where an employer manifests gross indifference to the safety of their employees, disregards obvious risks and/or turns deaf ear to internal complaints of faulty equipment among others.
If employer liability can be proven then the injured employees stand a better chance of receiving compensation more than what they are provided in workers compensation. For instance, workers in an organization could, with an assistance of the Chicago personal injury lawyer, take legal action against their employer where undoubtedly employer negligence can be demonstrated.
Legal Defenses Available to Employers
While there are legal rights of employees to compensation in case of workplace injuries, various defenses are also provided to the employers. Among the more common ones, contributory negligence is a type of defense whereby the employer can prove that the employee contributed to the injury. If the latter had disregarded safety protocols, for example, the former could counter a claim on grounds that they would not be held solely liable. However, the success of this defense many a time depends on whether the negligence of the employee was the cause of the accident.
Assumption of risk is another defense available to employers. In many occupations, but especially in those where high risks are involved, employees are said to have assumed the risks inherent in their employment. Employers can use the defense, arguing that, because the employee accepted a particular job, they must have known about the possibilities of a certain injury and therefore accepted it. This may be very hard to establish but would apply in those unique situations when there is an open risk within the employment contract or job description.
The Final Words
Employer liability for workplace injury is a serious legal issue that can include anything from keeping the workplace safe to dealing with workers’ compensation. While the majority of claims are settled through workers’ compensation, direct liability may result in cases where employers are grossly negligent or deliberately misbehave. It is thus expected that understanding these legal obligations and proactive measures could protect not only the employees but employers from legal risk.
