Spartan Capital Securities Lawsuit details
Business Law

Unraveling the Spartan Capital Securities Lawsuit

The recent Spartan Capital Securities lawsuit has sent ripples through the financial industry. The repercussions of this case shed light on regulatory practices and the enduring impact of fraudulent activities on the market. This article aims to comprehensively analyze the Spartan Capital Securities lawsuit and its implications.


Highlights of the Spartan Capital Securities Lawsuit

  • The Spartan Capital Securities lawsuit is a legal case involving Spartan Capital Securities, LLC, a full-service, integrated financial services firm based in New York City.
  • The lawsuit was filed by the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over allegations of Spartan Capital Securities’ violation of federal securities laws.
  • The SEC alleges that Spartan Capital Securities failed to comply with federal securities laws related to anti-money laundering (AML) and customer identification program (CIP) provisions.
  • Specifically, the SEC’s complaint argues that Spartan Capital Securities did not document and verify its customers’ identities. This failure potentially opened the door for money laundering or other illegal activities through the firm.
  • It’s also claimed that Spartan Capital Securities failed to report several suspicious transactions to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), violating the Bank Secrecy Act.
  • The SEC’s lawsuit seeks to enforce penalties and injunctions against Spartan Capital Securities to prevent future violations. The agency also seeks to have the firm improve its procedures and systems to comply with federal laws.
  • This lawsuit highlights the importance for financial institutions, including broker-dealers, to have robust systems to identify and report suspicious transactions. It also emphasizes the need for these institutions to comply with all aspects of federal securities laws, including those related to AML and CIP.
  • In terms of impact, the lawsuit can potentially tarnish the reputation of Spartan Capital Securities, and lead to financial losses due to penalties and legal fees.

Background of the Case

On February 20, 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a case against Spartan Securities Group, Ltd., a broker-dealer, and Island Capital Management LLC, a transfer agent, along with their principals, Carl E. Dilley and Micah J. Eldred. The lawsuit, known as the “Spartan Securities Group, Ltd., et al.”, was lodged in the Middle District of Florida. The charges pertained to their involvement in creating approximately 19 public companies that were, in reality, sham entities.

The October 2021 Offering

Fast forward to October 2021. Spartan Capital Securities, LLC, was identified as the sole underwriter and book-running manager for a public offering of 3,990,610 shares of Vicinity Motor Corp.’s common stock. The offering was executed for $4.26 per share to the public, resulting in gross proceeds of approximately $17,000,000.

The “Right of First Refusal”

Completing the October 2021 offering granted Spartan Capital the right of first refusal to act as Vicinity’s book-running lead managing underwriters. This right was provided under Section 6(b) of the Letter of Intent (LOI) and was valid for 12 months from the date of completion of the offering.

The March 2022 Offering

In March 2022, Vicinity announced the closure of a registered direct offering of 4,444,445 common shares and warrants to purchase an equal number of common shares. A.G.P./Alliance Global Partners acted as the sole placement agent for this offering, generating proceeds of approximately $12,000,000.

The Alleged Breach

Spartan Capital alleged that Vicinity failed to notify them about the March 2022 offering. This denied them the opportunity to exercise their right of first refusal. Spartan also claimed that had they been notified, they would have acted as the placement agent and earned substantial fees in cash and warrants to purchase Vicinity’s common stock.

The Charges and Verdict Of the Spartan Capital Securities Lawsuit

On August 10th, Spartan Securities and the other defendants were ordered to pay nearly $1 million in monetary remedies for their involvement in the fraudulent scheme. The court ruled that the defendants had abused their ‘gatekeeper’ role. The court ordered injunctive relief and imposed penny stock bars against them.

The Aftermath of the Verdict

Despite the verdict, Spartan Securities continued its operations. In the lawsuit against Vicinity Motor Corp., Spartan alleged that Vicinity improperly issued securities using a competing company, thus violating their LOI. Vicinity moved to dismiss the case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).

The Court’s Ruling

The Court granted in part and denied in part Vicinity’s motion to dismiss. It found that Spartan had adequately pleaded a breach of contract claim. However, the Court granted Vicinity’s motion to dismiss Spartan’s claims for breach of the implied covenant of good faith, fair dealing, and unjust enrichment, with leave to amend.

Lessons from the Spartan Capital Securities Lawsuit

The Spartan Capital Securities lawsuit underscores the importance of regulatory compliance in the financial industry. Broker-dealers and other market participants must abide by the rules and act in good faith, ensuring their actions do not harm the market’s integrity.

The Impact on the Industry

The case has raised awareness about the potential for fraud in creating public companies. It is a stark reminder to broker-dealers and other industry participants about the severe consequences of engaging in fraudulent activities.


The Spartan Capital Securities lawsuit is a landmark case highlighting regulatory bodies’ pivotal role in maintaining market integrity. It serves as a stern warning to financial entities about the dire consequences of fraudulent activities and non-compliance with regulations. As the dust settles, the industry must learn from this case to prevent similar occurrences in the future.

Spartan Capital Securities Lawsuit FAQ

Who was the plaintiff in the lawsuit?

the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)

Who was the defendant in the lawsuit?

Spartan Securities Group

Is Spartan Securities still operating?

Yes, as of January 2024, the Spartan Securities Group is still in business.

What was the verdict of the Spartan Capital Securities lawsuit?

The court decreed on August 10th that Spartan Securities is to remit close to a million dollars in financial restitution.

Leave a Reply